I meandered over to my high school's website, and decided to check out their alumni/general newsletter. sigh. And you know, I was so disappointed. One thing that always, always irritated me about St. Mary's was the push, push, pushiness towards big careers (translate: big money) and lots of braggy, braggy, braggy.
I am sorry. St. Mary's might be the "best high school in Portland" as I recall hearing during our rose festival day, but it's no Exeter.
So, they have an entire section for people of certain graduation years and small blurbs about their lives. Now, I am all for "so and so had their first baby" or "sally is a senator," but the entire "janie is on the deans list at (insert A-list college) and will spend her summer feeding orphans in Capetown while curing aids while writing her own screenplay" is just a bit much for me.
PULEEZEE.
But oh, so St. Mary's.
And about two weeks ago Alyx (an old HS buddy) and I were chatting, and she told me that a girl from our class was trying her luck at acting in New York City. Now, I am no Halle Berry, but let me tell you, this girl- not cute. Sure she had semi-good talent, but New York? Let me tell you about New York. It's rough. And the acting/modeling circuit. Even worse. But what really irritated me was the fact that it is this type of unrealistic confidence that plagues some SMA grads. And was promoted by some teachers!
When did we begin to believe that we were the best? When did we start telling women that mommy hood/housewifery were not as desirable as solving world hunger or running a law firm. Yes, it's no lie that I am not a feminist, and would be content to be a "lady who lunches" until her death, but- why is one definition of excellence/success okay?
People constantly plug the benefits of a single sex education. I have no idea how I feel about it. I'm a full three years out of high school, and still do not understand why over-confidence was plugged instead of realistic confidence.
Blah.